Speaking…for my friend

We don’t rise to our best selves when we are not inspired to be exceptional. We don’t when all we want to do is sit in the stands and throw verbal popcorn at the people trying to make meaningful change happen. Most of all, we don’t when we are focused on scoring political points and increasing our polarization. So, the question we should each ask ourselves is whether we are on the side of mediocrity and polarization or we are on the side of dialogue, consensus and progress. … Continue reading >Speaking…for my friend

Who’s censoring whom?

…the absurdity is that both sides of the Jefferson County school board political debate support peaceful protest and some level of civil disobedience. Neither supports an excess. Yet the College Board does not support Julie Williams’ peaceful-yet-rebellious suggestion that the local board of education appoint a committee to review the proposed curriculum. … Continue reading >Who’s censoring whom?

What is the issue? The insecurity of mail-in voting.

The issue I’d hoped to highlight is my sudden realization about how risky the mail-in ballot system is. I think that has been accomplished. Anyone who has followed this story now knows with clarity what is legal and how important election integrity is. I don’t think filing a complaint in this instance will help reform the insecure mail-in ballot process.

Colorado is not the only state trying to surmount the security challenges related to mail in voting. Maryland has concerns as well. Common Cause says voting by mail can increase turnout by 4-5%.

However, the New York Times says voter fraud is “…vastly more prevalent than the in-person voting fraud that has attracted far more attention…” They add “In the last presidential election, 35.5 million voters requested absentee ballots, but only 27.9 million absentee votes were counted, according to a study by Charles Stewart III, a political scientist at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”

If one cannot reasonably guarantee the security and authenticity of the ballots, then the convenience is not worth the risk. … Continue reading >What is the issue? The insecurity of mail-in voting.